Finding performance in naming service routing


Believe it or not; but for network congruences there is optimal naming of a name service not with bit of data that is only a couple of 0110110 difference in nsX like ns1, ns2, ns3, n4 but optimally a six letter networking route is a much better naming convention, using the domain these are some of the optimal naming conventions for naming services, not an NSA reference:-

  1. (equivalent of
  2. (equivalent of
  3. (equivalent of
  4. (equivalent of
  5. (equivalent of
  6. (equivalent of
  7. (equivalent of
  8. (equivalent of

Moving out of what 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. is only a single bit difference naming services would work better have a more distinguished route, which is more than one bit of data that is the difference of 00, 01, 10, 11 in the routing naming path as a six to eight byte naming convention.